Multiple Cavity Parts

Disclaimer: This page or section is currently under review by the community.

The content of this page or section can be subject to change at any time. If you find any issues or if you have any review comments please drop us an issue on the PROSTEP JIRA.

This page or section resolves KBLFRM-950

The Contact_point in the KBL allows the referencing of an unspecified number of Part_usage_selects in the role Associated_parts. This implementation guideline clarifies the valid use cases of multiplicities > 1.

For a standard contacting (the “90% case”), the Associated_parts association references a single Terminal_occurrence and an (optional) Cavity_seal_occurrence for sealed contacting situations.

Chapter 2.2 of the KBL Recommendation Document (V2.5) already defines:

The Contact_point specifies a single contacting variant. This means that the contacting is manufactured, as specified in the KBL. Either all participants (Cavities, Terminals, Seals, Wires) set into a relationship by the Contact_point exist in a specific harness or none. There is no requirement, to filter the participants of a contacting situation with information derived from Module_configurations in order to create a manufacturing variant.

The Contact_point represents a single potential. As a consequence, all cavities and wires referencing / being referenced by a Contact_point are short-circuited and have the same potential (even if the signals on the wires are named differently.

In other words, using the Associated_parts to represent a 150% contacting situation is not a valid approach in the KBL. However, there are still remaining situations, where more components than one Terminal_occurrence (and one Cavity_seal_occurrence) participate in a specific contacting situation. The representation of those cases in the KBL depends on the role that the components have in the contacting sitation.

  • Multiple Terminal_occurrence and/or Cavity_seal_occurrence are valid, if all the components of the respective class have a conducting (terminal) or sealing function.
  • All other components (e.g. wire fixations, damping elements) have to be represented as an Accessory_occurrence to the primary terminal component.

The representation is illustrated the following figure. Reasons for choosing this representation where:

  1. It is aligned with the representation in the VEC, which defines individual classifications for those components (WireEndAccessorySpecification & CavityAccessorySpecification)
  2. Representing those “accessories” as regular Associated_parts would mislead existing established sanity checks (e.g. the existence of a Cavity_seal_occurrence would raise the question why only one contact in the connector was sealed.)
Schematic illustration of the contact point